Your privacy, your call. No advertising cookies. May we count your visit in aggregate (Cloudflare, no cookies) and remember where you came from? If you reject, we won’t measure your visit. · Cookies · Privacy

Privacy settings

Choose what we measure and what we keep in this browser. We never sell or share your data.

Essential

Remember your theme, language, saved items and this choice. Without them the site cannot work the way you ask.

Always on

Keeps the source of your first and latest visit for 90 days (utm parameters and referring site). It only leaves your browser if you subscribe to the newsletter.

Cloudflare Web Analytics counts visits in aggregate: page, referring site, country, browser and load times. No cookies, no identifiers and no profiling; nothing is stored in your browser. It only loads if you accept it. If you reject it or switch it off, it does not load (or stops loading from the next page) and we do not count your Telegram clicks either.

Cookies · Privacy

EN
My account
Learning · Professional prompt

Prepare for an oral exam

Professional structure: role, context, objective, details, steps, format, criteria and self-check. Designed for better results, not guaranteed ones: always review the answer.

Never use real personal data. If you need to, run it through the data cleaner.

Fill in the blanks
## Role
Act as a demanding but fair examiner.

## Context
I have an oral exam or a viva and want to practise the questions.

## Objective
Simulate the exam and get feedback on my answers.

## Details (fill in what is in square brackets)
- [topic or syllabus]
- [duration and format of the exam]
- [level]

## Step-by-step instructions
1. Ask me one question at a time and wait for my answer.
2. After each answer, assess content, clarity and accuracy.
3. Ask a follow-up if my answer is incomplete.
4. At the end, summarise strengths and topics to review.

## Output format
Turn-by-turn conversation and a final report with strengths and weak topics.

## Quality criteria
- Questions move from general to specific.
- Feedback is specific.
- It does not give the answer before I reply.

## Self-check
Before answering, check every quality criterion. If information is missing, ask me instead of making it up, and at the end state what you have assumed.

The link opens the empty template: what you type is not included.

Objective

Simulate the exam and get feedback on my answers.

When to use it

This prompt is ideal when you need to shake off the nerves of defending your ideas under pressure, whether you are preparing for a postgraduate viva, an undergraduate oral defence, or a professional accreditation panel. It helps you test your academic argument flow and spot gaps in your knowledge in real time. However, it is far less helpful if you haven't reviewed your core reading yet, as you will merely end up guessing rather than refining your articulate reasoning.

Worked example: input (fictional data)

[topic or syllabus]: MSc Dissertation: 'Assessing the Viability of Modular Vertical Farming Systems in Urban Brownfield Regeneration across Northern England'. [duration and format of the exam]: 45-minute academic viva voce with an internal and external examiner. Interactive defence focusing on methodology, cost modelling, and environmental impact assessments. [level]: Master of Science (Distinction level expected).

Worked example: full response

Welcome to your mock viva. I will act as your external examiner. We will take this step by step: I will ask one question at a time, evaluate your response on content, clarity, and precision, and offer follow-ups where necessary. Let us begin with your research design. Question 1: In chapter three, you chose an empirical cost-benefit model relying heavily on projected energy tariffs from smaller test plots rather than established commercial hubs. Could you justify why you believe these figures remain robust when scaling up to brownfield regeneration schemes? Please provide your answer when you are ready. [Candidate responds] Feedback on your response: - Content: You clearly understood the initial rationale, but you overlooked seasonal price volatility in your baseline figures. - Clarity: Your delivery was calm, yet your second point meandered before reaching the core justification. - Accuracy: Solid grasp of municipal planning codes, but your capital expenditure figures seemed underestimated by roughly fifteen percent. Follow-up Question: Given that volatile energy pricing could wipe out your projected operating margin in year two, what secondary mitigation strategy would you present to local council planners? [Simulation continues through methodology, ethical considerations, and limitations] Final Report: Strengths: - Confident defence of brownfield site selection criteria. - Clear, jargon-free explanations of modular hydroponic mechanics. - Good professional composure when challenged on project timelines. Topics to Review: - Tighten your defence of initial capital expenditure calculations. - Clarify the long-term remediation responsibilities for contaminated industrial soil under local government frameworks. - Prepare crisper, more direct summaries for introductory questions.

Variants

Rapid-fire cross-examination

Drop the extended introductory remarks. Fire five sharp, consecutive questions targeting the weakest assumptions in my abstract, limiting my response time to sixty seconds per answer. Provide concise, bulleted feedback at the very end rather than after each individual question.

Undergraduate finals defence

Calibrate the tone for an undergraduate final-year panel. Focus on conceptual definitions, core literature engagement, and how well I explain theoretical frameworks, offering encouraging but rigorous constructive feedback to help build my speaking confidence.

Hostile external examiner

Adopt the persona of a highly sceptical external examiner who actively challenges my research methodology and data sources. Ask persistent follow-up queries that force me to defend my analytical choices and acknowledge research limitations rigorously.

Common mistakes

Related guide

General and assistant-specific tips

Tips by assistant

  • ChatGPT: save the role and format in a project or in custom instructions so you do not have to repeat them.

Getting the most out of it

  • Paste the prompt as is and only replace what is in [brackets].
  • If the answer does not fit, do not start over: ask for “shorter”, “more formal” or “as a table”.
  • Always review the result before using it: AI can get facts, dates or names wrong.

Before you paste it: quick checklist

  • State your starting level: “I know nothing” or “I know the basics”.
  • Ask for everyday examples and a review question at the end.
  • If something isn’t clear, ask it to “explain it another way”.
  • Check dates, figures and definitions against a reliable source.

How to adapt it to your assistant

The template works the same in ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or Claude because it only uses plain language. If your assistant supports fixed instructions (custom instructions, Gems or projects), you can store your preferred tone and format there and paste only the variable part. On a free plan, split long requests into two or three shorter messages.

See all Learning prompts

More professional prompts

← All prompts

Found this prompt useful? A new one every Tuesday

Every Tuesday, 5 minutes: AI news with sources, a tool with its prompt and a guide. Free, with one-click unsubscribe. What is inside and a sample issue